* BLUE DOGS MAKE THEIR MARK ON THE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Congressman Allen Boyd (D-FL) and his fellow Blue Dogs today praised the passage of Blue Dog-endorsed provisions included in the House rules package. Chief among these provisions, pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) budget rules mark the first, and most important, step to getting our country back on track fiscally and reigning in our national debt, now rapidly approaching $9 trillion.
The Blue Dog Coalition has long advocated a return to PAYGO spending, which expired in 2002. In the 1990s, with PAYGO rules on the books, our government’s budget deficits diminished and we recorded budget surpluses both in 1999 and 2000.
“Today is an exciting day for the Blue Dog Coalition,” said Congressman Boyd, Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration. “PAYGO worked in the past, and it will work again. With the Blue Dogs leading the charge, the Democratic-controlled Congress has demonstrated their strong commitment to fiscal responsibility and subsequently, a strong commitment to the future of our children, our grandchildren, and our great nation.”
The House rules package also requires full transparency and justification of all earmarks. This provision, in addition to PAYGO, is included in the Blue Dog 12 Point Plan, which was developed in 2005 to end the nation's addiction to deficit spending.
“The passage of the Blue Dog-endorsed provisions shows that the Blue Dogs have enhanced the Democratic agenda and will be a strong voice for fiscal responsibility in the new Congress,” Boyd stated. “However, our work is far from over. Today’s victory is simply the first step to balancing our budget and curbing our out-of-control national debt.”
Congressman Allen Boyd is a fifth generation farmer and Army veteran from Monticello, Florida, beginning his sixth term representing Florida’s 2nd Congressional District. In addition to his work on the Blue Dog Coalition, Congressman Boyd serves on the House Appropriations Committee and co-chairs the Congressional Rural Caucus.
* MODERATE STYLE AND WORKING CLASS ROOTS GIVE EDGE TO EDWARDS
DURHAM, N.C. (AScribe Newswire) -- John Edwards' role as the leading moderate among Democrats who are expected to run for president gives him an advantage with voters, says a Duke University political scientist who specializes in African-American and Southern politics.
"As it stands now, he appears to be the candidate who is positioned more at the center of the party, and I think that's where most of the base is, where the majority of the country is," says Kerry L. Haynie, associate chair of the political science department. "He's well-positioned. Can he take advantage of the position? That's the question."
Haynie also says the former vice-presidential candidate's decision to announce "a grass-roots, ground-up campaign" in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans is an effective strategy.
"I think it's very effective, and I think it reflects who he really is. He's from humble beginnings, a working class background," Haynie says. Edwards, who became a multimillionaire trial lawyer, is the son of a textile mill worker.
"His wealth is self-made, and exemplifies the American dream of becoming successful through hard work. We don't mind wealth if it's made the old-fashioned way -- if you earn it."
* A SECOND LOOK AT NUCLEAR POWER
Proposals to build nuclear power plants have often met opposition from environmental and progressive organizations, however, a growing number of green-minded activists are reconsidering their past objections to nukes.
The Lakeland (FL) Ledger reported on 12/22/06:
"In an article he wrote for Technology Review last year, Stewart Brand, a founder of the Whole Earth Catalogue, argued: "Everything must be done to increase energy efficiency and decarbonize energy production," including development of renewable energy sources like solar, wind and bio mass."
"But add them all up," Brand continued, "and it's just a fraction of enough. … The only technology ready to fill the gap and stop the carbon dioxide loading is nuclear power." http://tinyurl.com/wtky2
In another sign of a shift in attitudes toward nukes, the Progressive Policy Institute endorsed increased use of nuclear plants in "A Progressive Energy Platform" released last October. http://tinyurl.com/y2lqyy
According to the report entitled, "A Progressive Energy Platform,” which was released in mid-October, “Nuclear power holds a great potential to be an integral part of the diversified energy portfolio for America. It produces no greenhouse gas emissions, so it can help clean up the air and combat climate change. And, new plant designs promise to produce power more safely and economically than first-generation facilities.”
Even the founder of Greenpeace Patrick Moore is now making the case for going nuclear http://tinyurl.com/qa6rn If our nation is to gain energy independence, we must expand use of nuclear power and biofuels.
Friday, January 05, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
As a socially conservative economic populist engaged in trying to replace the bankrupt and practically memberless political parties in Britain (where ever-fewer people now vote), I humbly sumbit that the socially conservative economic populists who clinched your elections for the Democrats should put up a candidate for the Democratic Party's Presidential nomination, making it clear that (s)he will be run with or without the Party's approval. And, of course, they should follow through if necessary.
Among much else, this would represent a real return to American leadership in the world, causing long-overdue political earthquakes across Europe, Canada and the Antipodes.
I am intrigued by John Edwards. He says many things that make me believe that he understands what it means to lead in America.
Does anyone know how he feels about nuclear power? I listened to his podcast a couple of days before he officially announced his candidacy in New Orleans - he put energy independence and climate change near the top of his list of important campaign issues.
From my point of view, nuclear power has an extremely important role to play in helping to address both of those issues.
Rod Adams, Editor, Atomic Insights, Co-host of The Atomic Show Podcast, Founder and CEO, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc.
PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE!
If you are under 18, please make sure you give this message to your guardians!
The U.S. Senate is poised to consider a bill that could keep you from finding out what the politicians are doing in Washington, D.C.
In the Senate, lawmakers are scheduled next week to consider a bill that could strip everyday Americans of their rights to free speech. Some provisions of "Senate 1" bill would limit citizens' ability to express their views to the very officials they sent to office to represent them. S.1 aims to clean up recent lobbying scandals that have plagued the halls of our government. While most of the bill is good, it contains a provision, Section 220, that will severely limit the ability of Americans to stay abreast of the important issues facing our country.
If this horrible new bill passes, communications from Focus Action, known as "grassroots communications," will be tied up in miles of new red tape. These bureaucratic restrictions are unconscionable, and failure to comply could result in $100,000 fines.
It's clear that this is a concerted effort to silence the voice of Americans by making it harder for you to know what's happening. At the same time, Section 220 will create a loophole for labor unions, trade associations and foreign corporations.
Many public informing organizations will be affected, and these organizations, both liberal and conservative, will be required to inform the government of anything they broadcast that might influence the public opinion on legislation. This is a direct opposition of our God-given rights. We, the people of the United States, ARE the government. WE HAVE THE RIGHT to know what our elected officials are doing in Washington and elsewhere. This is an oppressive bill, and it WILL NOT be tolerated in this great democracy! To stop this atrocious bill, we, the people of the United States, must voice our opinions loud and clear against Section 220 of the Senate 1 bill. Again, most of the bill is good, but Section 220 must be not be allowed to pass. The only reason we know of this bill right now is because of "grassroots communications." In the future, if this bill passes, there is the good possibility that we may NEVER be allowed to be informed of this kind of information again. YOU MUST TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION. OUR FUTURE POSTERITY DEPENDS ON YOU.
1. Please call your congressman and both of your senators as soon as possible! To reach your congressman and senators, call the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121. Let them know, in a firm and unmistakable manner, that Section 220 of the Senate 1 bill is unacceptable, and urge them to oppose the unfair grassroots lobbying provisions (Sec. 220) and ensure that they are removed from S. 1.
Note- This link will provide you will the phone numbers of your congressman and both of your senators should you choose to call them individually:http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&Definition=Home&XSL=Home&SV_Section=Home
2. Please visit http://www.focuspetitions.com/ to sign a petition against Section 220 of the Senate 1 bill.
To learn more, please visit the following websites:
http://listen.family.org/miscdaily/A000000189.cfm
http://www.oneplace.com/Ministries/Focus_on_the_Family/Default.asp
ALSO: New scientific research evidence has shown that the killing of human embryos for stem cell research may no longer be necessary. Better stem cells may be obtained from amniotic fluid and the umbilical cord. But, tomorrow, Thursday, January 10, a new bill is proposed to be voted on in the House of Representatives that will expand federal funding of research that requires the killing of human embryos.
Sponsored by Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., H.R. 3 would dramatically increase the number of stem-cell lines eligible for federally funded research grants. In 2001, President Bush approved federal funding for research on only a very limited number of stem-cell lines left over from in-vitro fertilization -- and already scheduled for destruction.
On January the 8th Carrie Gordon Earll, senior analyst for bioethics at Focus on the Family Action, predicted that the amniotic research would be talked about on Capitol Hill over the next three days. "This will cause a ripple preceding the vote on Thursday -- and will put some pressure on some members of the House to take a good hard look at whether destroying human embryos is necessary," she said.
One new congressman, Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., agreed. "There's a lot of interest on both sides of the aisle -- and on both sides of the life issue -- for pursuing other types of stem-cell research, such as adult and cord-blood research, which has been receiving federal funding since 2001," Roskam told CitizenLink. The congressman said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., have decreed that no amendments or changes can be added to the stem-cell bill -- or to any of the bills Democrats hope to pass in the first 100 hours of Congress.
Please contact your U.S. representative and ask him or her to oppose any bill which uses your tax dollars to support research that destroys human embryos.
To learn more, please visit the following websites:
http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000003573.cfm
http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/bioethics/A000002145.cfm
PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE!
If you are under 18, please make sure you give this message to your guardians!
Post a Comment