Thursday, June 28, 2007

Blue Dog Caucus wrong to reject Nancy Boyda


As a grassroots Blue Dog, I am annoyed and disgusted by the decision of the Congressional Blue Dogs to exclude conservative Democrat Nancy Boyda of Kansas from membership. http://tinyurl.com/2b64g3 Boyda is a fiscal conservative and a strong supporter of gun rights. She has been a outspoken voice in the fight for border security and against amnesty for illegal aliens. http://tinyurl.com/38axj2 The excuse given for failing to admit Boyda is that the Blue Dog Coalition has a membership cap of 47. Of course, the Blue Dog Caucus could have lifted the cap and allowed Boyda to join. Common sense would suggest that accepting Boyda into membership would help to provide further gender and geographic balance within the Blue Dog Caucus.

The fact that the Blue Dogs would decline to accept Nancy Boyda's application proves that most members of the caucus are little more than self-serving, power-hungry jackasses. Some of the Blue Dog Caucus members are true populists but many are simply shills for big business interests. In refusing to admit Boyda, Congressional Blue Dog Caucus members are showing that they are more interested in their own personal power than rebuilding the moderate-conservative wing of the Democratic Party.

1 comment:

eddiestardust said...

Why can't we have common-sense gun laws? If you lived near Philadelphia you would understand.
A recent study showed that most not few, families who had guns FAILED to lock them up SAFELY and also had them loaded.

America does not need more guns but less, and I'm talking about handguns here not Rifles.

Sadly I think that until almost every family in America loses a loved one in a gun related death we will not achieve any progress here.