Sunday, January 20, 2008

Webb advocates rebuilding America's Navy




The Daily Press reports that Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) is advocating a larger Navy to maintain U.S. defense capabilities against China and other potential threats. A former U.S. Navy Secretary, Webb points out that the size of America's Naval fleet is at a 90 year low.
Webb calls for stronger Navy fleet

The senator wants to increase the size of the fleet beyond its current target of 313 vessels.

by Peter Frost

January 17, 2008

ARLINGTON - -->Sen. Jim Webb called for a stronger Navy fleet and expressed frustration with Senate Republicans and the Bush administration for obstructionist tactics Wednesday in a speech to the Surface Navy Association.Webb, a Virginia Democrat beginning his second year in the Senate this month, said the war in Iraq and a slowing economy are "the most serious pair of challenges we've faced since the combination of the Great Depression and World War II."
Echoing comments Tuesday by the Navy's top officer, Adm. Gary Roughead, Webb called for increasing the size of the Navy's fleet beyond its current target of 313 vessels and strengthening maintenance and modernization projects by encouraging more free-market competition among contractors.

"Three hundred thirteen can't do it, I can't see, in the long run," Webb said. "We're building one (submarine) per year and the Chinese are building three per year. We need a strategy based on the United States being a maritime nation, and the United States should be a sea power."
With a current fleet of 280 ships, and only 109 under way, the Navy's fleet, Webb said, is at a 90-year low. During his tenure as Secretary of the Navy, Webb said he oversaw a fleet of 568 ships."Simply stated, we are decommissioning Navy ships faster than we are building them," he said. "It is imperative that we reverse this steady slide in shipbuilding." He said industry, the Navy and Congress all bear responsibility to find ways to cut costs in shipbuilding, and shipbuilding facilities need a steady, reliable stream of work so they aren't forced to lay off workers during slow periods.
With the war in Iraq tying up much of the military's budget, the Navy and shipbuilding have largely taken a back seat in funding, Webb said. That's an error the Navy might have a hard time in recovering from, he said.
With new threats posed by an expanding Chinese military, a flagging economy and other discouraging factors, a strong Navy is as important as any time in the country's history. A key goal of the next administration must be to wind down the situation in Iraq — a war Webb called a "strategic blunder" — so more troops and resources can be deployed elsewhere, he said."We have economic issues, and we have issues of national security and military policy. At the same time, we have way too much bickering in this government," Webb said. "It is extremely frustrating."
After Democrats took control of Congress following the 2006 mid-term elections, the White House and Republicans in Congress "made a conscious decision that there would be no victories on major issues and, particularly on national defense issues" for Democrats, he said.
Obstructionist tactics by Senate Republicans led to 62 filibusters of Democratic-lead proposals in 2007, more than the previous record of 61 over a two-year period, he said."We've got to get into the political process the notion that the issues confronting us are greater than political parties," he said.
With time left in President Bush's last term winding the final turn, the president "has got to realize that if he wants any kind of legacy at all, (the administration) has to start cooperating," Webb said. "He better step up."
Check out this brief video narrated by Former Marine officer Tom Reynolds describing how the size of America's Navy fleet has been cut in half over the past twenty years.

1 comments:

adrian2514 said...

I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the media’s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming.

The Daily Green just put an article out talking about how the presidential candidates are not being asked where they stand on the issue of the climate change - this is surprising to me considering its such a MAJOR concern to people. I just saw a poll on www.EarthLab.com that says people care a lot what their next leader thinks about global warming (after you take it they show you the results). Does anyone know of another poll or other results about this subject?

If not, go to http://www.earthlab.com/life.aspx and take their poll to see which way the results go. This is a pretty legit website; they are endorsed by Al Gore and the alliance for climate protection and they have a carbon footprint calculator. No matter which political party you vote for this is an important issue for our environment, our economy and for homeland security.