Twitter / rightdemocrat

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Sacramento Business Journal: Don't let unemployment benefits expire



The Sacramento Business Journal explains why Congress must extend unemployment compensation benefits:

Allowing federally supported unemployment insurance benefits to expire would deliver a sharp blow to the economy and could endanger the fragile economy, a report released Friday by the California Budget Project concludes.

The benefits provide a substantial boost to the economy because jobless workers spend the money quickly and locally. They pay the mortgage or rent, buy groceries, pay the heating bill and put gas in the car.

Unless Congress acts, emergency measures that provide additional weeks of federally supported benefits to unemployed workers who exhaust their regular state benefits are set to expire Nov. 30.

If this happens, more than 400,000 unemployed Californians will lose access to federally supported UI benefits next month alone, the CBP reports.

Discontinuing the benefits before the job market shows strong signs of recovery would force unemployed workers and their families to cut spending. As a result, businesses would have fewer customers and weaker sales — and that could ultimately cost jobs, according to the report.

California’s unemployment rate was 12 percent in October, preliminary data from the state Employment Development Department show. That’s down slightly from a revised 12.2 percent in September. The unemployment rate in the Sacramento metropolitan area was an average of 12.1 in October, down fro a revised 12.5 percent in September.

“Congress has never before cut off emergency UI benefits at a time when the unemployment was this high,” the report concludes.

http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2010/11/19/budget-project-dont-let-unemployment.html

Following a failed vote in the House of Representatives to renew federal unemployment insurance for only three months, the National Employment Law Project (NELP) reissued its call for a full‐year renewal of the existing programs and pointed to a rush of new federal research that supports extending the program through 2011. Newly released studies by the Department of Labor and the Congressional Budget Office affirm, yet again, the vital role unemployment insurance has played in combating the recession and rebuilding the economy.

“Everything we know about unemployment, the economy and the costs and benefits of federal unemployment insurance dictates renewing the programs for a full year – and ending the game of chicken Congress has played with America’s unemployed workers, their families and communities for the last several months,” said Christine Owens, executive director of the National Employment Law Project.

“Sadly, Congress is once again heading out of town just as the federal unemployment insurance programs are slated to expire, this time right as the holiday season begins. It is critical that a full‐year renewal of the program moves to the top of the agenda when Congress returns on November 29th, to minimize the hardship and disruption to families and the economy that will result from the November 30th cut‐off,” said Owens.

“Several new federal studies are just the latest proof that Congress should enact a meaningful, year‐long reauthorization of the federal unemployment insurance programs that expire November 30th, or else the economy – and millions of out‐of‐work Americans – will take a giant step back,” said Owens. “Short‐term stop‐gap measures, like the three‐month continuation the House defeated today, are ill‐advised and however well intentioned could ultimately do more harm than good.”

On Tuesday the Department of Labor issued an independent study commissioned by the Bush Administration and co‐authored by the chief economic advisor to John McCain’s Presidential campaign, finding that since mid‐2008, the federal unemployment insurance programs have saved 1.6 million jobs in every quarter – averting 1.8 million layoffs per quarter at the height of the downturn – and that the programs reduced the unemployment rate by 1.2 points.

The DOL study also affirmed the multiplier effect of unemployment insurance: “For every dollar spent on unemployment insurance, this report finds an increase in economic activity of two dollars,” it states.

A new Congressional Budget Office study this week echoed the DOL findings, saying that “the extensions of unemployment insurance benefits in the past few years increased both employment and participation in the labor force over what they would otherwise have been in 2009."

A Census Bureau report in September found that 3.3 million people, including 1 million children, were kept out of poverty with income support provided through unemployment insurance, a NELP analysis of the study explained.

Goldman Sachs analyst Alec Phillips has projected that allowing the federal unemployment insurance programs to expire will cut consumer spending significantly and reduce already‐languid GDP growth by half a percentage point.

A Congressional Budget Office report from January ranks unemployment insurance as the most effective stimulus to the economy, generating $1.90 in economic activity for every $1 the government spends. The report ranks tax cuts for wealthy Americans as the least effective method of economic stimulus.

“There is a real disconnect in those calling for unpaid‐for millionaire tax cuts – adding $700 billion to the deficit – but then refusing to commit $65 billion for the long‐term unemployed hanging on by a thread, even though the spending on unemployment insurance produces twice its cost in new economic growth. As the CBO has reported earlier, tax cuts to the wealthy are the least effective form of economic stimulus, whereas unemployment insurance is far and away the most effective,” said Owens.

These studies parallel strong public support to continue the unemployment insurance programs. A poll released Monday, conducted by Hart Research Associates, found that Americans overwhelmingly believe Congress should continue providing federal unemployment insurance to workers who have exhausted their state benefits and are still unemployed, and that Americans firmly reject the idea that deficit concerns should lead to cuts in support for the jobless when the unemployment rate remains so high.

www.unemployedworkers.org